Wouldn't it cost less to @ssign the option for your spread , to the sub-tenant/buyer at the closing? Assuming this is a sandwich lease. Or is there a problem I don't see in doin it this way?
If you are using straight Options on junkers (wholesaling), seasoning is a nonissue, because professional rehabbers either use their own cash or private lenders (hard money). Otherwise, you have to find a lender who will treat the deal on a case-by-case basis (and base their lending upon the comps regardless of the time involved).
[addsig]
I use a simultaneous/collapsed closing.
[addsig]
Wouldn't it cost less to @ssign the option for your spread , to the sub-tenant/buyer at the closing? Assuming this is a sandwich lease. Or is there a problem I don't see in doin it this way?
JD
Depends on the size of your spread and how you get paid. Assignments can present other problems, such as the T/B knowing your profit.
[addsig]
Is this also the case when you are closing a straight option?
Do the simultaneous closing?
Does that creat problems with a new buyers lender? Or should I do my own due diligence and lead buyers to lending where this would not be a problem?
Or will it pose a problem at all? Doing a simultaneous close on a straight option. Wouldn't the lender want to verify I have title to the property?
JB
[addsig]
If you are using straight Options on junkers (wholesaling), seasoning is a nonissue, because professional rehabbers either use their own cash or private lenders (hard money). Otherwise, you have to find a lender who will treat the deal on a case-by-case basis (and base their lending upon the comps regardless of the time involved).
[addsig]
what about non-junkers.
say a $150,000
you have an option for $100,000
if you found a buyer for $125,000
would you do a simultaneous close on this? would the lender have issues because you (when you are selling) do not have title to the property?
JB
[addsig]
Depends on the lender. Some do. Some are flexible, providing you can prove the value.
[addsig]